Tag Archives: Immigration

Immigration reform in spotlight again across US

By LAURA WIDES-MUNOZ Associated Press

MIAMI (AP) _ Immigrants and their allies will march this weekend on Taylorville, Ill., in time for the annual chili fest. They’ll take a break from harvesting spuds to demonstrate in Boise, Idaho, and they’ll hold candles until dawn along the banks of Lake Hollingsworth near Orlando, Fla.

In more than 150 cities around the country, they will gather to remind the nation that despite the feuds in Congress over the debt ceiling and health care _ despite the government shutdown _ they are still here and still demanding immigration reform.

Organizers are pitching Saturday as a “National Day for Dignity and Respect” and the beginning of an “escalation to bring immigration reform across the finish line this year.”  Their weekend is the prelude to a rally and free concert Tuesday on the National Mall in Washington, where they hope to draw tens of thousands.

There also will be Texas rallies in Houston, San Antonio Dallas, Austin and Corpus Christi.

The chances they get anything through Congress before the year’s end, though, are splinter thin. If House Republicans are willing to make a deal on anything with Democrats, it’s likely to be about the budget, not immigration.

But Tampa-based activist Felipe Sousa-Rodriguez said Saturday’s events are as much about sending a message to average Americans and to the immigrants themselves as they are about spurring action in Congress.

“It’s about seeing us in our communities, not just as a number: 11 million undocumented,” he said. “And it’s about immigrants seeing that there are other immigrants out there, and that we are active members of our democracy,” he added. “A lot of people feel isolated, and when you see all these marchers, that gives you hope and the energy to join them.”

Sousa-Rodriguez knows about feeling isolated. He thought his situation was unique until the 2006 pro-immigrant marches, when he realized thousands of other immigrant youths were, like him, in the country illegally.

Sousa-Rodriguez, who works with the national LGBT grassroots group GetEQUAL, said Saturday’s mobilization is also about showing the support the immigrant movement has earned from religious leaders, labor and civil rights organizations and the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

The Alliance for Citizenship, a broad national coalition of organizations that includes the AFL-CIO, the ACLU, the YWCA and the Southern Poverty Law Center, is driving the mobilization.

In Washington, the shutdown aside, House Democrats unveiled an immigration bill Wednesday proposing an extended path to citizenship for the 11 million immigrants illegally present, along with heightened border security. But immigration reform has been on the backburner since before the budget standoff. Many rank-and-file in the House’s Republican majority are disinclined to deal with the contentious issue of whether those in country without proper papers should be given such a path.

Tellingly, the organizers who came up with “Day of Dignity and Respect” found a somewhat vague, yet much more inclusive, name for the mobilization than anything linked to passage of a specific bill.

Saturday’s biggest rallies will likely be in the usual places, across California, in Chicago, Arizona and New York. In Los Angeles, organizers predict about 20,000 will march along the Hollywood Walk of Fame. In New York, they’ll cross the Brooklyn Bridge. But more than 100 events will take place in towns and cities with far less visible immigrant communities.

In Boise, activist Fernando Mejia is organizing farm workers who will hold their mobilization Sunday because potato harvesting season is starting up anew and onion crops need to be picked into the weekend.

In Lakeland, Florida, midway between Tampa and Orlando, immigrants and their supporters will hold an overnight prayer vigil from 8 p.m. till 10:00 a.m. along the lake.

Professor Tom Shields, lecturer at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell said staging events in small towns across the country sends a message that immigration is not just an inside the Beltway concern. “It’s not just in California and Texas. You have these others states that are having this experience…. this population is living right next door to us.”

Shields likened the potential impact of the marches to the early March 2010 immigration demonstrations in Washington that drew thousands of youths just as lawmakers were on the cusp of approving the nation’s historic health care overhaul.

“That same day, 100 protesters against the Affordable Care Act stood outside the Capitol. And of course, the next day the press led with the Affordable Care Act,” he said. “But to the students who went down there, it felt like a galvanizing moment. They had not seen so many people gathered before. They felt like their personal struggles were now connected to larger issues.”

The result: more volunteers, more media attention back home and last but not least, more funding.

That’s not to say the weekend mobilizations don’t have specific targets.

In Arizona, activists are calling out Gov. Jan Brewer. She recently issued executive orders to bar immigrants who have received deferred action _ those granted temporary federal permission to live and work in the U.S. _ from getting drivers licenses.

In Illinois, immigrants will march 30 miles to the city of Taylorville _ in time for that heartland town’s annual Chili fest. Their goal: to get the attention of U.S. Rep. Rodney Davis, a Republican from Taylorville who initially seemed open to comprehensive reform with a path to citizenship.

In Arkansas, activists are targeting U.S. Rep. Steve Womack, a conservative Republican who has opposed a path to citizenship for those in the country illegally, as well as their U.S.-born children. Organizers plan to march on his hometown of Rogers, where he was once mayor. Coordinator Mireya Reith, also a member of the State Board of Education, noted Arkansas is among the top five states with the fastest-growing immigrant population but that many eligible immigrants don’t become citizens, or if they do, they don’t vote.

She said her organization has been working to double the Latino and Asian vote in the state, and she views Saturday as a prime occasion for outreach, especially with the 2014 election a year away.

Whether Congress is willing to act, she says she’s already seen a change on the ground in Rogers.

Case in point: “Back when Wolmak was mayor, we never would have been able to do this,” she said.

U. S. Supreme Court immigration ruling brings civil rights

<strong>Laci K. Ollison
The Houston Sun</strong>

Implications of Supreme Court’s Ruling on Immigration Law leaves many with questions. Civil Rights Groups to assist Latino community with information.

On June twenty-fifth, the Sup

reme Court struck down three sections of the Arizona law that cracks down on illegal immigration. However, the law’s most controversial element, better known as the “show me your papers” provision remains intact.

Arizona Senate Bill 1070 (known more commonly as just SB 1070) contains 14 sections and dozens of subsections, but only two full sections and two subsections were blocked by a judge shortly before it went into effect in July 2010. Here is a brief summary of what the Supreme Court decided:
• Section 2B (upheld): This part of the bill says state and local law enforcement officers in Arizona are authorized to determine the immigration status of anyone they reasonably suspect might be in the United States illegally. Forms of identification suggested by the bill include an Arizona driver’s license, Arizona ID card, tribal enrollment card or other official ID issued by a US federal, state or local government.
• Section 3 (struck down): This section would have made it a state crime for undocumented immigrants not to carry an alien registration document. The ruling claimed this merely reiterated federal law, and as such was superseded.
• Section 5C (struck down): This section would have made it a state crime for undocumented immigrants to look for a job or perform work in Arizona.
• Section 6 (struck down): This part of the bill would have allowed a state or local police officer to conduct an arrest without a warrant when police have probable cause to believe an individual committed a felony, a misdemeanor or a crime that would make them removable from the United States.

Leaders of Houston United and Pastor’s In Action, two civil rights groups, gathered on July 6th for a press conference.

“These are broad sweeping implications here, and when this law got put before the Supreme Court, we all sat wondering what this will mean,” says Mike Espinoza from Houston United. “Will the courts make sure that police can’t ask us for our papers just because of the color of our skin, or will this open season on immigrants? So, these are part of the questions that everybody is in their homes facing.”

Espinoza says they have an open dialogue with the Houston Police Department. However he admits they’re working on one with the Harris County Sheriff’s Department. He also says they don’t see eye to eye because of its support of the 287G program, the federal law that partner’s law enforcement with ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to intercept, interview and detain foreigners suspected of being in this country illegally.

Houston United and Pastor’s In Action partnered together to produce a forum in hopes of educating the Latino community on exactly what this law means.

Gerardo Cardenas with National Church ID, a member of Pastors in Action, says they want to clarify what the letter of the law states.

“Our people are afraid of being racially profiled,” Cardenas says. “What we don’t want to happen is for law enforcement to think that we are illegal just because we look Hispanic.”

“The population of Latino’s in Harris County alone is greater than the population of the state of Colorado,” says Espinoza.

According to the 2011 Harris County Census, the population of people of Hispanic or Latino origin is 41.4% of the total population.

<strong>Spanish Version</strong>

Implicaciones de la Sentencia del Tribunal Supremo sobre la Ley de Inmigración deja preguntas sin respuesta. Grupos de derechos civiles para ayudar a la comunidad latina con información.

En junio de 25o, la Corte Suprema anuló tres secciones de la ley de Arizona que reprime la inmigración ilegal. Sin embargo, el elemento más controvertido de la ley, más conocida como la “muéstrame tus papeles” disposición se mantiene intacta.

Arizona, la SB 1070 (más conocido simplemente como la SB 1070) contiene 14 secciones y docenas de subdivisiones, pero sólo dos secciones completas y subsecciones dos fueron bloqueados por un juez poco antes de que entró en vigor en julio de 2010. Aquí está un breve resumen de lo que la Corte Suprema de Justicia decidió:
• Sección 2B (confirmada): Esta parte del proyecto de ley dice que los agentes del orden locales y estatales de aplicación en Arizona está autorizado a determinar el estatus migratorio de cualquier persona que razonablemente sospeche que pudiera estar en los Estados Unidos de manera ilegal. Formas de identificación sugeridas por el proyecto de ley incluye una licencia de conducir de Arizona, Arizona, tarjeta de identificación, tarjeta de inscripción tribal u otra identificación oficial emitida por un federal de los EE.UU., gobierno estatal o local.
• Sección 3 (abatido): En este apartado se han convertido en un crimen de Estado para los inmigrantes indocumentados no llevan a un documento de registro de extranjero. El gobernante afirmó que esta se limitó a reiterar la ley federal, y como tal fue reemplazado.
• En la sección 5C (abatido): En este apartado se han convertido en un crimen de Estado para los inmigrantes indocumentados para buscar un trabajo o realizar un trabajo en Arizona.
• La sección 6 (abatido): Esta parte del proyecto de ley habría permitido a un oficial de policía local o estatal para llevar a cabo una detención sin orden judicial cuando la policía tiene causa probable para creer que una persona ha cometido un delito grave, un delito menor o un delito que haría ellos extraíble de los Estados Unidos.
Los líderes de Houston Unidos y del pastor en Acción, dos grupos de derechos civiles, se reunieron el 6 de julio para una conferencia de prensa.
“Estos son amplias implicaciones radicales aquí, y cuando esta ley he puesto ante la Corte Suprema, nos sentamos todos preguntándose qué significará esto”, dice Mike Espinoza de Houston Unidos. “Serán los tribunales de asegurarse de que la policía no puede pedirnos nuestros trabajos sólo por el color de nuestra piel, o la voluntad de esta temporada abierta a los inmigrantes? Así pues, éstos son parte de las preguntas que todo el mundo está en sus casas que se enfrentan. ”
Espinoza dice que tienen un diálogo abierto con el Departamento de Policía de Houston. Sin embargo, admite que están trabajando en una con el Departamento del Sheriff del Condado de Harris. También dice que no ve a los ojos a causa de su apoyo al programa 287G, la ley federal que la aplicación de la ley pareja con el ICE, Inmigración y Aduanas, para interceptar, entrevista y detener a extranjeros sospechosos de estar ilegalmente en el país.
Houston Unidos y del pastor en Acción se unieron para producir un foro con la esperanza de educar a la comunidad latina sobre exactamente lo que significa esta ley.

Gerardo Cárdenas con la Iglesia Nacional de identidad, un miembro de los Pastores en Acción, dice que quiere aclarar lo que la letra de la ley establece.

“Nuestra gente tiene miedo de ser perfil racial”, dice Cárdenas. “Lo que no queremos que ocurra es que la policía a pensar que son ilegales sólo porque nos fijamos hispana”.

“La población de los latinos en el Condado de Harris por sí sola es mayor que la población del estado de Colorado”, dice Espinoza.

De acuerdo con el Censo 2011 del Condado de Harris, la población de personas de origen hispano o latino es del 41,4% de la población total.

the alphabet song in phonicsphonics letter primary phonics workbook phonics board gamesphonics courses