Prominent Democrat: Texas voting map discriminates

By PAUL J. WEBER

Associated Press
SAN ANTONIO (AP) _ Congressional Texas Democrats returned from Washington on Monday to bash redrawn voting districts in federal court, testifying that the GOP-backed map discriminates by crowding blacks and Hispanics into shared districts despite a statewide surge in minority growth.

U.S. Reps. Eddie Bernice Johnson, Henry Cuellar and Al Green each asked a three-judge panel to throw out the redistricting map drawn by the GOP-controlled Texas Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Rick Perry this summer.

Hispanics accounted for two-thirds of Texas’ population growth the last decade. One by one, the elected Democrats testified the new map doesn’t reflect those gains and deprives Hispanics of a chance to elect their own representatives.

“Nothing is more satisfying to any minority group than having someone who looks like them represent them,” said Johnson, who was first elected to her Dallas district in 1992.

The Texas attorney general’s office began their defense later Monday, and made their first witness a Republican mapmaker who testified that the new map actually resulted in more districts with a majority of voting-age Hispanics than plans submitted by Democrats.

Gerardo Interiano, general counsel to Republican House speaker Joe Straus, said the new map gives Hispanics a fair chance to participate in the political process.

“More than ever,” Interiano said.
The prominent testimony from congressional members signaled that Democrats were winding down their case after more than a week of calling experts and minority leaders affected by the new map. They expected to rest later Monday after the scheduled testimony of U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee.

The state contends the map is fair and maintains or increases the voting power of minorities.

Closing arguments are expected by the end of the week.

Texas received four new congressional seats following the last census, more than any other state, in wake of a population boom was overwhelmingly driven by Hispanics,

The new congressional map was drawn with the goal of protecting and possibly expanding the 23-9 majority enjoyed by Republicans in Texas’ delegation in Washington.

The Democratic lawmakers said the surge in Hispanic growth warranted those residents getting more representation in new districts. Democrats argue the Republican plan splits Hispanic and black communities, so that conservative white residents would be more likely to win seats in Congress.

Each of the congressional Democrats conceded Monday that the new map didn’t diminish their own chances of re-election. But they warned the new boundaries would create “tension districts” _ overcrowded minority districts split among blacks and Hispanics, and divided over which candidates to elect.
“It’s like throwing a few crumbs out there for them to fight over,” Johnson said.

Interiano said the new map was designed to give all incumbent lawmakers the opportunity to preserve their seats. Along the border, for example, the district of Republican state Rep. Aaron Pena was redrawn to try to include more GOP voters because Pena switched parties before the last session.

Interiano said that while the redistricting process was “member-driven” in the Legislature, not all plans submitted by lawmakers were legal. One Democratic plan to add another so-called Hispanic “opportunity district” in the Rio Grande Valley didn’t work, Interiano said, because it had the ripple effect of splitting counties further north in violation of the Texas Constitution.

Green, the Houston-area congressman first elected in 2004, said his district that currently has a plurality of black voters could be more evenly split with Hispanics under the new map. He said that by contrast, more than two dozen districts controlled by white voters are unlikely to change.

“It’s difficult to believe that it could happen by accident, the type of surgery that was performed,” Green said of the new map.

Under the Voting Rights Act, new Texas maps must be cleared by the U.S. Department of Justice to ensure the changes do not diminish minority representation. That case is pending in Washington.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.